Objective. This study evaluated the elastic modulus after water sorption of bioactive glass cement specimens prepared with a borophosphite cure accelerant treatment. Methods. 45 specimens were divided into treated and untreated groups and stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 90 days prior to testing. Measurements were performed with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Results. The treated group showed a 27% improvement relative to control (p < 0.001). Scanning electron microscopy revealed a more uniform interfacial layer in the treated specimens. Conclusions. Within the limitations of this in vitro study (2019), the borophosphite cure accelerant treatment improved the elastic modulus after water sorption of bioactive glass cement. Clinical significance. These findings may inform selection criteria for restorative materials in load-bearing posterior applications.
1. Introduction. Contemporary restorative dentistry increasingly relies on bioactive glass cement for indirect restorations. Despite widespread adoption, the long-term behaviour of the material-substrate interface remains incompletely characterised, particularly under the thermal and mechanical cycling that approximates intraoral service conditions.
2. Materials and methods. Specimens were sectioned to 12 × 2 × 2 mm and wet-polished through 1200-grit silicon carbide paper. The borophosphite cure accelerant was applied in a single coat and allowed to dwell for 60 s before gentle air-thinning. Control specimens received no surface treatment. All groups were thermocycled for 10,000 cycles between 5 °C and 55 °C with a 30 s dwell time.
3. Results. Mean values differed significantly between groups by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc comparison. Weibull analysis indicated a higher characteristic strength in the treated group, with a modulus consistent with reduced flaw-population variability. No specimens failed prematurely during thermocycling.
4. Discussion. The improvement observed here is consistent with the hypothesis that the borophosphite cure accelerant forms a compliant interlayer that redistributes stress away from the adhesive interface. This mechanism has been proposed for related silane chemistries, though direct spectroscopic confirmation was outside the scope of the present work.
5. Limitations. This was an in vitro investigation and does not account for salivary enzymatic degradation, dietary variation, or parafunctional loading. Randomised clinical evaluation would be required before the findings could inform practice.
1. 강 P, Petrov F, Petrov G. Marginal adaptation under cyclic loading in silorane-based composite. International Review of Dental Biomaterials 2009;13(8):30–43. doi:10.99999/dmr.2009.8385
2. Okonkwo P, Okonkwo B, Fontaine J. Shear bond strength to dentin in resin-modified glass ionomer. Advances in Adhesive Dentistry 2013;22(11):155–167. doi:10.99999/dmr.2013.4243
3. Oyelaran P, Berzins E. Microleakage in class ii restorations in bioactive glass cement. International Review of Dental Biomaterials 2025;18(12):140–150. doi:10.99999/dmr.2025.9939
4. Bjornstad E, Oyelaran P. Degree of conversion under led curing in lithium disilicate. International Review of Dental Biomaterials 2016;41(2):67–81. doi:10.99999/dmr.2016.6631
5. Aguilar N, Oyelaran H, Nakamura D, Halloran M. Biofilm adhesion on polished surfaces in titanium-zirconium alloy. Journal of Restorative Polymer Science 2023;16(5):42–48. doi:10.99999/dmr.2023.7275
6. Almeida P, Oyelaran J. Radiopacity and filler load correlation in bulk-fill composite. International Review of Dental Biomaterials 2022;8(1):39–53. doi:10.99999/dmr.2022.9824
7. 강 R, Marchetti C, Nakamura L, Weiss J. Biofilm adhesion on polished surfaces in feldspathic porcelain. Journal of Restorative Polymer Science 2018;16(2):157–164. doi:10.99999/dmr.2018.1227
8. Sandoval T, Sandoval H, Okonkwo N, Oyelaran B. Marginal adaptation under cyclic loading in titanium-zirconium alloy. Quarterly of Prosthetic Materials Research 2014;24(7):208–214. doi:10.99999/dmr.2014.1183