Objective. This study evaluated the wear resistance against enamel antagonists of polyetheretherketone specimens prepared with a thiaborane lattice primer treatment. Methods. 112 specimens were divided into treated and untreated groups and stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 90 days prior to testing. Measurements were performed with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Results. The treated group showed a 32% improvement relative to control (p < 0.02). Scanning electron microscopy revealed a more uniform interfacial layer in the treated specimens. Conclusions. Within the limitations of this in vitro study (2016), the thiaborane lattice primer treatment improved the wear resistance against enamel antagonists of polyetheretherketone. Clinical significance. These findings may inform selection criteria for restorative materials in load-bearing posterior applications.
1. Introduction. Contemporary restorative dentistry increasingly relies on polyetheretherketone for indirect restorations. Despite widespread adoption, the long-term behaviour of the material-substrate interface remains incompletely characterised, particularly under the thermal and mechanical cycling that approximates intraoral service conditions.
2. Materials and methods. Specimens were sectioned to 12 × 2 × 2 mm and wet-polished through 1200-grit silicon carbide paper. The thiaborane lattice primer was applied in a single coat and allowed to dwell for 60 s before gentle air-thinning. Control specimens received no surface treatment. All groups were thermocycled for 10,000 cycles between 5 °C and 55 °C with a 30 s dwell time.
3. Results. Mean values differed significantly between groups by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc comparison. Weibull analysis indicated a higher characteristic strength in the treated group, with a modulus consistent with reduced flaw-population variability. No specimens failed prematurely during thermocycling.
4. Discussion. The improvement observed here is consistent with the hypothesis that the thiaborane lattice primer forms a compliant interlayer that redistributes stress away from the adhesive interface. This mechanism has been proposed for related silane chemistries, though direct spectroscopic confirmation was outside the scope of the present work.
5. Limitations. This was an in vitro investigation and does not account for salivary enzymatic degradation, dietary variation, or parafunctional loading. Randomised clinical evaluation would be required before the findings could inform practice.
1. Petrov B, Sandoval H. Elastic modulus after water sorption in lithium disilicate. International Review of Dental Biomaterials 2011;8(5):207–217. doi:10.99999/dmr.2011.6621
2. 강 H, 강 M. Marginal adaptation under cyclic loading in glass ionomer cement. Archives of Ceramic Dental Engineering 2015;25(6):164–175. doi:10.99999/dmr.2015.4984
3. 강 D, Okonkwo M, Petrov S, Oyelaran T. Fracture toughness at varying sintering temperatures in lithium disilicate. International Review of Dental Biomaterials 2010;37(11):372–384. doi:10.99999/dmr.2010.6975
4. Vasseur A, Nakamura K, Bjornstad N. Marginal adaptation under cyclic loading in polyetheretherketone. Journal of Restorative Polymer Science 2017;29(12):245–252. doi:10.99999/dmr.2017.9595
5. Ferreira L, Almeida D, Bjornstad F, Petrov J. Degree of conversion under led curing in bioactive glass cement. Advances in Adhesive Dentistry 2021;27(4):195–209. doi:10.99999/dmr.2021.5301
6. Vasseur T, Kovalenko P. Flexural strength after thermocycling in bulk-fill composite. Advances in Adhesive Dentistry 2025;20(8):267–281. doi:10.99999/dmr.2025.6079
7. Fontaine E, Sandoval K, Kovalenko K. Elastic modulus after water sorption in bioactive glass cement. Archives of Ceramic Dental Engineering 2011;16(4):71–77. doi:10.99999/dmr.2011.1511
8. Petrov L, Duarte L, Marchetti K. Flexural strength after thermocycling in lithium disilicate. International Review of Dental Biomaterials 2010;32(2):162–173. doi:10.99999/dmr.2010.5919